ABSTRACT
Abstract Aim: To verify the response of tissue saturation index (TSI) during ischemia-reperfusion (IR) interventions with different cuff-pressures. Methods: Twenty-nine healthy men experienced in resistance training were recruited. Each one has undergone a control condition (no cuff) and one of the three IR interventions: 1) 190 mmHg (CP-190, 22.7 ± 3.0 years; 176.6 ± 3.9 cm; 77.3 ± 9.5 kg; 2) 100 mmHg (CP-100, 22.9 ± 6.3 years; 180.5 ± 4.0 cm; 85.2 ± 14.1 kg) and 3) 20 mmHg (CP-20, 20.3 ± 2.4 years; 171.8 ± 5.2 cm; 72.4 ± 6.0 kg). Cuffs were placed on the proximal region of the thighs. IR interventions consisted of three cycles of 2-min occlusion-reperfusion. TSI was measured using near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), positioned on the middle portion of the vastus lateralis of the dominant leg. The oxygenation was measured at the control conditions (no cuff) and during cuff interventions. Results: While TSI values of CP-20 did not change compared to control (p > 0.05), the TSI in CP-190 was lower in the ischemia (p < 0.05), and CP-100 was lower in the second and third ischemia (p < 0.05). However, the TSI value increased during reperfusion but did not return to control levels (p < 0.05). Conclusion: TSI of the CP-190 significantly decreased during ischemia. However, these values increased by about 16% in the reperfusion period. Thus, our results show that the RI intervention may have caused an increase in metabolic demand, as even with the release of blood flow, the TSI values were below those of the other interventions.
ABSTRACT
Abstract Aims: To determine lactate threshold (LT) by three different methods (visual inspection, algorithmic adjustment, and Dmax) during an incremental protocol performed in the leg press 45° and to evaluate correlation and agreement among these different methods. Methods: Twenty male long-distance runners participated in this study. Firstly, participants performed the dynamic force tests in one-repetition maximum (1RM). In the next session, completed an incremental protocol consisted of progressive stages of 1 min or 20 repetitions with increments of 10, 20, 25, 30, 35, and 40% 1RM. From 40% 1RM, increments corresponding to 10% 1RM were performed until a load in which the participants could not complete the 20 repetitions. A rest interval of 2 min was observed between each stage for blood collection and adjustment of the workloads for the next stage. Results: Our results showed no significant difference in relative load (% 1RM), good correlations, and high intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) between algorithmic adjustment and Dmax (p = 0.680, r = 0.92; ICC = 0.959), algorithmic adjustment and visual inspection (p = 0.266, r = 0.91; ICC = 0.948), and Dmax and visual inspection (p = 1.000, r = 0.88; ICC = 0.940). In addition, the Bland-Altman plot and linear regression showed agreement between algorithmic adjustment and Dmax (r2 = 0.855), algorithmic adjustment and visual inspection (r2 = 0.834), and Dmax and visual inspection (r2 = 0.781). Conclusion: The good correlation and high agreement among three methods suggest their applicability to determine LT during an incremental protocol performed in the leg press 45°. However, the best agreement found between mathematical methods suggests better accuracy.